Published by Peter Barron Stark & Associates

Your premier resource for sharpening & strengthening your negotiation skills & techniques or providing training

    Tactic of the Week   March 30, 2005


Peter Baron Stark: PBS Consulting - Everyone Negotiates

Peter Barron Stark
President


Subscribe for Free !

The Master Negotiator

The Premiere Newsletter for Negotiators
The Master Negotiator is a monthly newsletter packed with tips, strategies, and tactics to ensure your success in virtually every negotiation.  The Negotiating Tactic of the Week gives you an insider's look at hundreds of strategies and tactics.  Make sure you know more than your counterpart!  Simply enter your email address in the box provided to start your subscription.
 

 

 

 

Introducing our
newest book

Here's what our readers
are saying ......

 

Order Your Copy
 

Visit our website at www.everyonenegotiates.com for more great resources
on negotiation

 

Contact us!

Peter Barron Stark
& Associates

11417 W. Bernardo Ct.
San Diego, CA  92127

Phone: 877.727.6468
Phone: 858.451.3601
FAX 858.451.3604

 

Tactic #34 - Whatever

Summary:  Appearing indifferent to the outcome of a negotiation.


With this tactic, one counterpart appears to be uninterested in the outcome of the negotiation. She simply encourages the other counterpart to follow through with the terms. Her attitude is clearly, “Whatever . . .”

Example
Company A warns Company B that if a delinquent bill is not paid, the matter will be turned over to a collection agency. Company B replies, “We are already being sued by six other companies. Next week we are planning to file for bankruptcy. We will provide you with the name of our bankruptcy attorney and you can send the collection paperwork directly to him. Perhaps that will save you some time.”


A second example is a parent giving a teenager some tough feedback about a bad report card. The parent says, “If you don’t improve your grades, you will be grounded indefinitely.” The teenager replies, “Whatever, I don’t care. I don’t have any friends or anyplace I want to go anyway.”
 


Counter
In the first example, although Company A’s goal, getting the money, remains the same, it may be in the company’s best interest to switch tactics. First, Company A could utilize the tactic of Calling Your Bluff and ask for the name and address of the bankruptcy attorney. If there really is no bankruptcy attorney, Company A may want to stay on the collection course. If it seems the debt is eventually going to fall into the bankruptcy courts, Company A may want to try the tactic of Moving the Goalpost, agreeing to accept a lesser amount if the account is settled immediately.
Every parent wants to know the counter to the second example! Although it is impossible to predict every child’s reaction, we have two suggestions. First, the parent could ask, “If you are grounded indefinitely and you get asked to the prom, how will you feel when you can’t go?” A second possible tactic is Calling Your Bluff. The parent could respond, “Great! At least I will know where to find you until your grades improve.”

 


Ask the Negotiator

 

Dear Master Negotiator,


I'm a buyer for a major chemical company. The site I am located at is a manufacturing facility. I've been selected as the materials buyer for a large turn around that will take place, at this location, later this summer. Of course the pre turn around work is being planned/performed and contracts are being negotiated. This is the reason why I went out on line for extra help and ideas. I came across the web site of which you are affiliated. I've taken the Karrass training paid for by the company I am employed and still feel a little stumped but want all the "free" help I can get. What better way than the challenge from Peter Stark's newsletter.

The company that I am dealing with has been asked to quote pre turn around turbomachinery inspections and repairs. Their quotes equal in the neighborhood of $400,000. I would like to see those costs dropped as even though I realize they are an OEM, they understand that we chose their product and that we are pretty much stuck going to them for this type of work. I would like to see their quotes drop at least 20% across the board for these 7 or so proposals, but will settle for 10%. (Of course not saying this to them)

Through my preparations to get a counter offer together, I reviewed the history of orders that our company (globally in the US) has with their company (globally in the US). I noted that we placed orders in the neighborhood of 1.3 million. With that said, I based this discovery as my major point on negotiating the current proposals down. Our engineers enjoy working with this company. They are helpful and seem to perform a good job. But being the OEM, like I said, we are pretty much stuck to whom we have to use. It is the engineers preference to go to them likewise. So I led my counter offer with the $$ figures and stated that we spent a tremendous amount of money utilizing their services. I stated that looking ahead at our turn around budget, I counter offered a 20% decrease in their proposal. I've yet to hear from them.

 

Best Regards,

D

 

Dear D,

 

You’ve presented us with a tough challenge. Given the scenario you’ve shared, you don’t appear to have a lot of options. You note that the company doing the inspections and repairs is the Original Equipment Manufacturer, (OEM); that your company’s engineers like working with this company; and that the company is helpful and has done a good job in the past. In similar situations, our experience has been that even if you were able to use a competitor, the OEM would void your warranty on their equipment.

Our suggestion is that as you move forward with contract negotiations; ensure that all involved at your company are on the same page. In other words, get your boss to support you in facilitating a meeting with engineers who use the OEM. Jointly agree on what a realistic reduction in the contract should be, and then present a united front. While we understand your tactic of requesting a 20% reduction, you may have more credibility with the contractor if you present your documentation, indicating, for example a 12.5% reduction in cost. If the contractor knows you’ve done your research and are supported by the engineers using the equipment, you will have more credibility in the negotiation. In conclusion, hold your internal negotiations first, and then go forward armed with your research and knowing that you’re well supported by your own company in the negotiation.
 

Best Regards,

 

Peter and Jane
 


Ask the Negotiator - Are you involved in a negotiation and not sure what strategies or tactics to use?  Send in your toughest negotiation challenge and our team of expert negotiators will outline a specific plan to ensure your success.  Please send your negotiation challenge (please put Negotiation Challenge in the subject line) to patti@pbsconsulting.com.  If your challenge gets published, we'll send you an autographed copy of The Only Negotiating Guide You'll Ever Need, by Peter Stark and Jane Flaherty ($14.95 retail.)

 


To view the latest issue of The Master Negotiator, the premiere on-line newsletter for negotiators, follow this link:

The Master Negotiator, Volume 2, Number 11 The Fifteen Rules Every Negotiator Must Know

To view previous Negotiating Tactics of the Week, follow this link:

Negotiating Tactics of the Week


Forward to a Friend - If you enjoy this newsletter and would like to forward to a friend or colleague, please click on the "forward" link at the bottom of the page.

Copyright 2003 Bentley Press